Kain v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Postconviction counsel puts five arrows to the bow. One is aimed at a trial court ruling on admissibility of evidence. One aims at the testimony of the key prosecution witness. Three are directed to the conduct of the defense by trial counsel. Each misses its target.
Marital privilege.
Defendant, by postconviction counsel, asserts that the trial court admitted certain testimony of the wife of defendant in contravention of the limited marital privilege established by Wisconsin statute. The wife’s testimony was that her husband (1) was working for one Carley Schmidt; (2) was collecting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. FeltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- State v. FenclWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Boyer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.