Legal Opinion
People v. Cerrone
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 1989No. 87CA0149PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE.
The People brought this action to seize certain items of real and personal property belonging to defendants, John and Emily Cerrone, as proceeds of certain prostitution businesses. The People sought a forfeiture of defendants’ family home, automobile, a pickup truck, a motor home, and a boat with a trailer. The trial court found no evidence to trace any proceeds to the purchase of the family home, but ordered the seizure of the other items.
Defendants appeal that order as an improper application of the statute then in effect, § 16-13-303(3)(b), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- White v. RicketsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. LOT 23Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Walker v. City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ellis v. CharnesColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Ferris v. Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Union, Local 26Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bigelow v. NottinghamColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Shaoul v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Frank C. Klein & Co. v. Colorado Compensation Insurance AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.