Legal Opinion

Mayer Schmidt v. Wooten

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Smith County. Tried below before Hon. E. W. Simpson.

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Associate Justice.

Sallie Malone, for herself and children, instituted an action of trespass to try title against W. E. Wooten, to recover 13 acres of land, part of the John E. Crawford survey, in Smith County, claiming title to said land under the 10 years’ statute of limitation; and alleged that W. E. Wooten, in December, 1901, had entered upon said land, tore down the fence that had been erected by plaintiffs and took possession of said land. After the institution of the suit W. E. Wooten died and his heirs were made parties. They set up title to the land and claimed that W. E. Wooten…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Hynes v. PackardTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Jones v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Kirby v. EstillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Brown v. HearonTexas Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Casey v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Clinton v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. French v. Bank of Southwest Nat. Ass'n, HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Shaw v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Wiggins v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API