Hynes v. Packard
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Victoria County. The suit was brought by Packard against Hynes et ah, and the latter appealed from a judgment recovered by plaintiffs, and on its affirmance obtained a writ of error.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Associate Justice.
The facts alleged were sufficient to sustain an action for breach of warranty of title, and the trial seems to have been had in the court below upon the theory that the suit was to recover upon the warranty; the Court of Civil Appeals so treated the case, and we think it unnecessary to review any of the assignments of error based upon the rulings upon exceptions directed against allegations which presented a different phase of the case. The application for a writ of error contains only such grounds as relate to the right to recover upon the alleged breach of warranty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Silliman v. GanoTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Dalton v. BowkerNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Phillips v. ReichertIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Raines v. CallowayTexas Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Houston First American Savings v. MusickTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Lorino v. Crawford Packing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Luttes v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.