Legal Opinion

Hull v. Klamath Cnty. (In re Hull)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 4, 2018No. Bankruptcy Case No. 17-63283-tmr7; Adversary Proceeding No. 17-6089-tmrPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS M. RENN, Bankruptcy Judge

Plaintiffs, the debtors in the underlying bankruptcy case, brought this action to avoid the transfer of their real property as a preference under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b)1 or, alternatively, as a fraudulent transfer under § 548(a). At the pretrial conference held on February 28, 2018, the parties agreed to resolve all pending claims on the record after submission of a statement of stipulated facts, agreed exhibits, and trial memoranda. Although Defendant subsequently moved for summary judgment on each of Plaintiff's claims, I treat the motion as a memorandum in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Edgewater Medical Center v. Edgewater Property Co. (In Re Edgewater Medical Center)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Creditors' Committee for Jermoo's Inc. v. Jermoo's Inc. (In Re Jermoo's Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Land Associates, Inc. v. BeckerOregon Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brusznicki v. TuckerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  2. Gabbert v. Josephine CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  3. Lynch v. Multnomah CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  4. Tucker v. BrusznickiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API