Legal Opinion

Armour Fertilizer Works v. Wynne Mercantile Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1930No. 19862, 19894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In order to render valid a contract of accord and satisfaction, “it is not essential that the matter should be really in doubt; but it is sufficient if the parties consider it so far doubtful as to make it the subject of compromise. City Electric R. Co. v. Floyd County, 115 Ga. 655 (42 S. E. 45); Bell v. Lazenby, 126 Ga. 767 (56 S. E. 81). But it is necessary, in order to furnish a consideration for such compromise agreement, that the contention be made in good faith and be honestly believed in. Dickerson v. Dickerson, 19 Ga. App. 269 (91 S. E. 346).” Preston v. Ham, 156 Ga. 223, 234 (119…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Belt v. LazenbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Preston v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. City Electric Railway Co. v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Tyson v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1809

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sylvania Electric Products Inc. v. Electrical Wholesalers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. King v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Nauman v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Hume v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Baxter v. Bank of GrantvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API