Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Landphere

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided October 8, 1902No. 881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent Nos. 308,981 and 308,982 for machines for quilting fabrics, granted December 9, 1884, ■ the former to Frank E. Palmer, and the latter to William H. Palmer, Jr. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

PLATT, District Judge.

The letters patent upon which this suit is based are Nos. 308,981 and 308,982, issued on the 9th day of December, 1884, respectively, to Frank L. Palmer and William H. Palmer, Jr., and controlled by the complainants. Defendant is charged with having infringed claims 14 and 24 of patent No. 308,981, and claims 2, 3, 4, 12, 15, and 20 of patent No. 308,982. The defense is noninfringement.

I need make no extended comment upon the state of the prior art, nor upon infringement. The contentions involved in such a discussion have been fought out thoroughly, and to a finish, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. John E. Brown Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1897
  2. Palmer v. John E. Brown Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
  3. Palmer v. MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Palmer v. LandphereU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilden Pump & Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Pressed & Welded Products Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API