Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Mills

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided June 29, 1893No. 728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Frank L. Palmer and others against Crefehl Mills and others for infringement of patents. On motion for preliminary injunction. Order allowing injunction unless bond be given.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the infringement of claims 14 and 24 of letters patent No. 308,981, and of claims 2, 3, 4, 12, and 15, of letters patent No. 308,982, granted to Frank L. Palmer, December 9, 1884, for sewing or quilting fabrics. The following facts appeared upon the hearing: The complainants’ patents provide for a novel and useful mode of stitching comfortables by machinery. The commercial advantages of these improvements have enabled complainants to practically command the entire business of this country in this class of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snow v. DuxstadWyoming Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gulf City Coal & Wood Co. v. BruCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1895
  3. Palmer v. LandphereU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1900
  4. Palmer v. LandphereU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1902
  5. In re Chicago Sugar-Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API