Legal Opinion
Landry v. All American Assurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1982No. 81-3302PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Below, the unsuccessful plaintiffs sought to try their case under several theories of securities law, but were permitted to proceed under only one. On this appeal it is their contention that the district court erred both in its dismissal of the other claims and the jury instructions given. With the exception of one state law issue, we find that no reversible error was committed and affirm the result below.1
I. A Change of Seasons
In the spring of 1974, appellants Bryan Zeringue, Curtis Chauvin and Dr. W. B. Landry learned — later to their detriment— that certain common…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Bernard A. Schlifke and Harvey Kallick, D/B/A K & S Investments Co., a Partnership v. Seafirst Corp. And Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Billy R. Whalen v. Prentiss H. Carter, Jr., Claude Sharkey v. The Bank of Greensburg, John Fussell v. The Bank of GreensburgCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Kimmel v. PetersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.