Legal Opinion

Buzzanco v. Lord Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 2001No. Civil Action No.01-106 EriePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action assert claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against Lord Corporation (hereinafter “Lord”), MacDonald Illig Jones & Britton, LLP (hereinafter “MacDonald Illig”), and Sheriff Robert Merski. The claims arise out of the execution of a Writ of Seizure obtained by Lord in a state court replevin action. MacDonald Illig represented Lord in this action, and representatives of both Lord and MacDonald Illig allegedly accompanied deputies of the Erie County Sheriff and participated in the execution of the writ on March…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dougal v. Mortgage (In Re Dougal)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Anderson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Daniels v. County of Chester, Tax Claims Bureau (In Re Daniels)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Keiser v. Matamoras Community ChurchDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. STEPHENS v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API