Legal Opinion
Heyliger v. Krygier
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 28, 2018No. 6:14-CV-06123 EAWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Pro se plaintiff Derek A. Heyliger ("Plaintiff") brings this action asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. 1). The operative complaint in this action is Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, filed on June 19, 2014. (Dkt. 8). Defendants Paul Black ("Black"), Stephen Casaceli ("Casaceli"), Richard Beall ("Beall"), and Joyce Krygier ("Krygier") (collectively "Defendants") have now moved for summary judgment. (Dkt. 53).
Defendants contend that summary judgment is appropriate because they did not use excessive force against Plaintiff,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laurie Ortolano v. P City of Nashua, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025
- Cisse v. AnnucciDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025
- Crocker v. JamisonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- D.C., an infant by his mother and natural guardian, Tie’Anna Collins, TIE’ANNA COLLINS, individually, and TOAJACK BROWN, individually and as the Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Tahlil Brown v. ELDRED CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, TRACI FERREIRA, and MONIQUE-GALE MESSINADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- DeLaney v. CanfieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.