Legal Opinion

Gulf & S. I. R. v. Carlson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924No. 24563PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

(After stating the facts as above). At the conclusion of the evidence the court, at the request of the defendant bus company, directed a verdict in its favor and declined appellant’s request for a directed verdict. The action of the court in directing a verdict for the bus company and refusing to direct a verdict for appellant is assigned as error.

We will consider first the question whether the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for appellant. We are of opinion that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the proposition that appellant was violating section 4045, Code of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. HardieMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Nelson v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. ClarkeMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SandersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Columbus Greenville R. Co. v. LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bates v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Albert v. Doullut & Ewin, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co. v. BeasleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Dukes v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API