Legal Opinion
Allied Industries Employees, Teamsters, Local 481, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 2002No. Nos. 00-71392, 01-70022, 01-70086; NLRB No. 21-CA-31471Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
We affirm the decision of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in all respects except the NLRB’s conclusion that Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. (BFS) engaged in solicitation in the three-store unit, which we reverse. We grant in part the NLRB’s petition for enforcement.
1. THE COMPLAINT AMENDMENTS
A. Section 10(b)
Section 10(b)’s six-month statute of limitations applies to the period between the occurrence of the alleged unfair labor practice and the filing of the charge, not the filing of the complaint.1 Thus, amending the complaint did not violate the limitations period.2…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fant Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gary E. Calkins Anna Rosa Calkins, D/B/A Indio Grocery OutletCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- National Labor Relations Board v. Antonino Carilli, D/B/A Antonino's RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.