Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 1991No. CA CR 90-91PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Chief Judge.

Len Jeffery Hill appeals from his conviction of eight counts of delivery of a controlled substance, advancing several points of error. We find sufficient merit in one of them to warrant reversal and remand for a new trial. We also address two other points due to the likelihood that they will arise again on retrial.

The State introduced evidence that on eight occasions appellant purchased controlled substances with money furnished to him by undercover police officer Roger Ahlf or Ahlf s confidential informant, Paul Carruthers. After each purchase, appellant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Flurry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. McFadden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Garst v. CullumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whitener v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Ramey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Hendrix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Kellogg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API