Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ames

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2016No. 2016-0857PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Arthur Arould Ames of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0018227, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1969. On December 10, 2015, we suspended his license on an interim basis after receiving notice that he had been convicted of theft by deception, a fifth-degree felony, for misappropriating funds from his late brother’s estate. In re Ames, 144 Ohio St.3d 1280, 2015-Ohio-5105, 45 N.E.3d 1024. Later that month, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Ames with professional misconduct based on the facts that led to his felony conviction.

{¶ 2} The Board of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. KraemerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. MahinOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In re AmesOhio Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FuscoOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Yavorcik (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API