Legal Opinion

Kulp v. Chamberlain

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1892No. 466PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

This was an agreed statement of facts, submitted to the court under section 553, R. S. 1881. Under the agreed statement of facts Livy Chamberlain, trustee for the creditors of Samuel Daub and Enos B. Kulp and John Ummel, constituting the firm of Kulp & Ummel, and Warren H. and Emma Thomas submitted to the court the following controversy between them, and agreed upon the case as follows, to wit: May 15th, 1889, Samuel Daub, being a building contractor, entered into a contract with Warren H. Thomas, by which said Daub was to repair and construct a dwelling-house on the land of said Warren H.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hasseld v. SeyfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carriger v. MackeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Matter of HullUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  3. Lockridge v. BrockmanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API