Legal Opinion

Carriger v. Mackey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1896No. 1,716PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

This is an action by appellee, against appellants, to enforce a mechanic’s lien. One *393of the errors assigned is that the amended complaint of the appellee fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The objection urged to the complaint is that it fails ■ to show that the action was brought within the time limited by law.

The statute requires that “the complaint shall be filed” in the circuit or superior court, within one year from the time when the notice was received for record in the recorder’s office. R. S. 1894, section 7259; Kulp v. Chamberlain, 4 Ind. App. 560. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charlestown School Township v. HayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Kulp v. ChamberlainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ward v. YarnelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Basham v. Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Drake Lumber Co. v. Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Deming-Colborn Lumber Co. v. Union National Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API