Infante v. Dignan
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), in which Plaintiff maintains that Defendants violated the federal constitutional rights of Rosemary Infante, (“Ms. Infante”) deceased, when they classified her death as a suicide. Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion (Docket No. [# 13]) to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the application is granted and this action is dismissed.
BACKGROUND
Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are taken from Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (“the Complaint”) in this…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rich v. Fox News Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Estate of Gugsa Abraham Dabela, et al. v. Town of Redding, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Sesam v. Superior Stone & Interiors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024