Legal Opinion

Infante v. Dignan

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 22, 2011No. 09-CV-6406 CJSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This is an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), in which Plaintiff maintains that Defendants violated the federal constitutional rights of Rosemary Infante, (“Ms. Infante”) deceased, when they classified her death as a suicide. Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion (Docket No. [# 13]) to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the application is granted and this action is dismissed.

BACKGROUND

Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are taken from Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (“the Complaint”) in this…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rich v. Fox News Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Estate of Gugsa Abraham Dabela, et al. v. Town of Redding, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
  3. Sesam v. Superior Stone & Interiors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API