Legal Opinion

Pearson v. SCH. BD. OF IND. SCH. DIST. 381

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1984No. C3-84-356Published

1Opinion of the Court

356 N.W.2d 438 (1984)

Terrance PEARSON, Respondent,

v.

SCHOOL BOARD OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 381, Appellant.

No. C3-84-356.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 23, 1984.

Don L. Bye, Halverson, Watlers, Bye, Downs & Maki, Ltd., Duluth, for respondent.

James N. Abelsen, Edgerton, Theobald & Abelsen, Duluth, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and LANSING, JJ.

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals from a judgment finding appellant improperly placed respondent on involuntary leave of absence. Appellant claims there was substantial evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Liffrig v. Independent School Dist. No. 442Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API