Legal Opinion

Harding v. Parshall

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This was a bill brought by Parshall to enforce a specific performance of a contract and compel a conveyance from appellant and Paullin, of a tract of land in Mercer county. It alleges that the defendants claimed to be seized in fee of the land, and, on the 6th of April, 1864, contracted in writing to sell the land to complainant, for the sum of $1,400; that $20 were paid in hand, $600 to be paid on the 15th of May of that year, and the balance on the first Mondays in May, 1865 and 1866, with six per cent interest, and to pay all taxes. On payment being made, he was to receive a deed with…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waters v. TravisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. VieringIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lyman v. GedneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Lancaster v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Morse v. SeiboldIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. First National Bank of Las Vegas v. OberneIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API