Legal Opinion

Lashley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1986No. 50204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of capital murder after a jury trial and sentenced to death. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal by the Missouri Supreme Court in State v. Lashley, 667 S.W.2d 712 (Mo. banc 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873, 105 S.Ct. 229, 83 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984), which contains a detailed discussion of the murder. Movant subsequently filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion and counsel was appointed. Counsel then filed an amendment to the 27.26 motion.

Movant asserts on appeal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frederick Lashley v. William Armontrout, Warden, Missouri Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. BoyceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Frederick Lashley v. William Armontrout, Warden, Missouri Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Lusk v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Lusk v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API