Legal Opinion

United States v. Neal Thomas Neamand

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 16, 1971No. 71-1252PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

In 1970 we announced the rule that where there is a request for reopening of a classification based on the existence of conscientious objector belief, and the registrant has established a prima facie entitlement, the local board must buttress any denial of such request with a statement of reasons for its action. Scott v. Commanding Officer, 431 F.2d 1132 (3d Cir. 1970). This appeal from a conviction, D.C., 302 F.Supp. 1296, for refusing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462(a) requires us to decide whether…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walter Bachowski v. Peter Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor Andunited Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. United States Ex Rel. Harrison v. PaceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. United States v. Andrew John ShomockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Joel ZiskowskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. William G. Cale, Jr. v. Thomas M. Volatile, Commanding Officer Afees and Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API