Legal Opinion

ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1995No. C9-94-1335Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant insurer challenges the judgment in favor of respondent contractor on the contractor’s claims in negligence, unjust enrichment, and estoppel. Appellant also challenges the trial court order denying its motion for indemnity from respondent adjuster. We affirm.

FACTS

This ease arose following a fire in the home of Nancy Mollinedo on November 15, 1990. The home was insured by appellant Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company (Sentry) under a policy naming the United States Farmer’s Home Administration (FHA) as mortgagee. Sentry contracted with respondent GAB Business…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Transamerica Insurance Group v. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Anderson v. DeLisleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API