Legal Opinion

Midwest Bank & Trust Co. v. Roderick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1985No. 84-1724PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of its action for judgment on the unpaid balance of a promissory note. It contends that section 9 — 504 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 26, par. 9— 504(3)) did not require it to give defendant Roderick notice of the sale of collateral where Roderick’s co-debtor, rather than plaintiff, sold the collateral. In the alternative, plaintiff contends that lack of notice is not a complete bar to a deficiency judgment, but instead gives rise to the rebuttable presumption that the value of the collateral was equal to the amount of the debt.

In…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Main Bank of Chicago v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Krueger v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. First Galesburg National Bank & Trust Co. v. JoannidesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kohan v. Rimland School for Autistic ChildrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Rivinius, Inc., Debtor. Rivinius, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Cross Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant-Counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Watseka First National Bank v. RudaIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Orr v. EdgarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Learning Curve International Inc. v. Seyfarth Shaw LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Board of Education of Center Cass School District No. 66 v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API