Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Troy Design Services Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 19, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 94-0031PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

Troy Design Services Company (“Troy Design”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against it. The trial court concluded that Troy Design’s employee, Rhett Schaller, was a “lent employee” under the exclusive control of General Motors Corporation (“GM”). Nevertheless, the trial court ruled that Troy Design was vicariously liable for Sehaller’s negligence in harming a fellow employee working at GM.

The issue before us is whether a general employer can be held vicariously liable for the negligent actions of a lent employee in the exclusive control of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Ray v. Tucson Medical CenterArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Bright v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Morgan v. ABC MANUFACTURERSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. Tarron v. Bowen MacHine & Fabricating, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Inmon v. Crane Rental Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Ruelas v. Staff Builders Personnel Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API