Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rachak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 2012PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.:

Appellant, Tarik Rachak, appeals from the order entered on April 5, 2012, denying his petition for relief filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A §§ 9541-9546. We affirm.

The relevant facts and procedural history of this case were set forth by the PCRA court as follows:

[Appellant] was arrested on January 4, 2011 for Simple Possession of Cocaine, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(16), and Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(32). [Appellant] appeared pro se at his Arraignment before The Honorable Judge Gregory Snyder on April 29, 2011;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. FluhartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FrederickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Rachak v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Com. v. Abrams, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Aptiliasimov, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Ballard, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API