Legal Opinion

Williams v. Paul F. Beich Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1946No. 31214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The sole exception here is that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. The evidence showed that the defendant ordered and received the merchandise, “candies,” described in the petition. This made out a prima facie case for the plaintiff. The defendant contended in his answer that the consideration had failed, in that the said consideration was merchandise which by implication of law was warranted as suitable for the use intended, and that the candy was not thus suited to such use.

The-defendant testified that the candy was not reasonably suited for the purposes for which it was intended;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Wilson v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. New York Life Insurance v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Haverty Furniture Co. v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mustang Transportation, Inc. v. W. W. Lowe & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Western Atlantic R. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Harris v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Harris v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API