Minnis v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. None of the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial are erroneous, and all were authorized by the evidence.
2. The 2d ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial cannot be considered, for two reasons: (a) “ It is not complete and understandable within itself, and, to ascertain whether the evidence objected to and admitted was material, this court would have to refer to the brief of the evidence. ” Jones v. State, 27 Ga. App. 574 (3) (109 S. E. 515); Cœsar v. State, 22 Ga. App. 796 (1) (97 S. E. 255). (&) “It is not shown what objection to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Hagood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Cæsar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Hays v. FreshwaterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Hamby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Waters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950