Legal Opinion

Hamby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1948No. 31847PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. There are two offenses set forth in the Code, § 26-2811, and they may not be joined in one and the same count. They may be set forth in the same indictment, under separate counts.

2. The court erred in overruling the demurrers as set forth in division 1 of the opinion.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 21, 1948.

R. R. Hamby was indicted by the Grand Jury for larceny after trust. There are six counts in the indictment. Since the alleged imperfections in the third, fourth, fifth, and six counts are the same as those in the first and second counts, we will deal with the first and second counts only and the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Long v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Hagood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Minter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Hazelton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API