Legal Opinion

Gourneau v. Love

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided December 9, 1994No. Civil A2-94-100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEBB, Chief Judge.

This action was commenced in the Turtle Mountain Tribal Court. The Complaint appears to present a survival action, a wrongful death action, and an action for damages incurred by the plaintiff prior to the decedent’s death. The defendant Jackson and Coker Locum Tenens, Inc. (“Jackson and Coker”) removed the action to this court based on the diverse citizenship of the parties, in aecor-dance with 28 U.S.C. § 1441. The plaintiff now moves to have this action remanded to the tribal court, asserting that the action cannot be removed.

The plaintiff argues that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Myrick v. Devils Lake Sioux Manufacturing Corp.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1989
  4. Mary Becenti, as Trustee for the Testamentary Trust Known as "Randy's Laundry," and Individually v. Sheryl Vigil and Raymond BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. The People of the Territory of Guam v. Richard J. LandgrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams-Willis v. Carmel Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
  2. DeCoteau v. Sentry InsuranceDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1996
  3. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Vanir Construction Management, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API