Legal Opinion

United States v. Dixon

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 2000No. Criminal Action 00-146-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMOANDUM AND ORDER

KATZ, Senior District Judge.

Curtis Marshall Dixon is charged in a two-count indictment with possession of cocaine base (“crack”) and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Now.before the court is the defendant’s motion requesting the disclosure of information relating to a confidential informant (Cl). Background 1

Philadelphia police officers searched Mr. Dixon’s home, pursuant to warrants, on March 11, 1999, and April 21, 1999. Mr. Dixon requests the disclosure of the identity and reliability of the Cl who was involved in a controlled buy that was basis for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Rufus Brown, Rodney Franklin, Ama Baltimore, Rufus Brown, in 92-3491, Ama Baltimore, in 92-3562Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Jiles, Anthony, EliecerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Arthur NapierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. NapierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API