Legal Opinion

Chickasha Plumbing Company v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1961No. 39507PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

Chickasha Plumbing Company (hereinafter called Chickasha) seeks to set aside an award against it by the State Industrial Court to Herman Rogers, claimant, for injuries received in an accident covered by the compensation laws of Oklahoma. It is its contention that Rogers was not in the employ of Chickasha but was an employee of the Otto Scott Trucking Company.

There is little, if any, dispute as to the material facts. Chickasha engaged in the business of a plumbing contractor. Otto Scott Trucking Company (hereinafter called Scott) was a licensed class “B” carrier under the laws…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brooks v. A. A. Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Parkhill Truck Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Garr v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Crutchfield v. MeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. King's Van & Storage Company v. CrinerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kerr v. Akard Brothers Trucking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Mistletoe Express Service v. BrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co. v. MillsapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Matter of Death of WorcesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. City Diesel Service v. CollierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API