Legal Opinion

King's Van & Storage Company v. Criner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1956No. 36690PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, King’s Van & Storage Company, Incorporated, a Corporation, plaintiff in error, will be referred to as King’s. The defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Simpson, d/b/a White’s Transfer Company, will be referred to as White’s. The defendant in error will be referred to as plaintiff.

The plaintiff was employed by the defendant White’s to drive a truck. White’s was a partnership engaged in the moving business in Tulsa, but it was not authorized to transfer goods in interstate commerce. Defendant King’s was in the same business *1017in Oklahoma City, but was a larger concern and was authorized to haul…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. SutfinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Wylie-Stewart MacHinery Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Myers v. Little Church by the Side of the RoadWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Magnum Foods, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. CMS Continental Natural Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Parkhill Truck Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Haynie v. HaynieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Harrington v. Certified Systems, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API