Wilcox v. Orellano
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtKrauser, C.J.
Subsection 5—119(b) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article 1 permits a party, whose medical malpractice “action or claim” has been “dismissed once ... without prejudice,” because of that party’s failure to attach a report of an attesting expert to the certificate of a qualified expert, to re-file that “action or claim,” so long as it is filed within 60 days from the date of dismissal, regardless of whether the statute of limitations has run. This “savings provision,” 2 however, does not apply, under the preceding subsection of section 5-119, that is, subsection 5—119(a), or the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Witte v. AzarianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Mazor v. State, Dep't of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilcox v. OrellanoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015