Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Rome

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1980No. Civ. 56997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WENKE, J. *

Richard and Naomi Rome were married for over 32 years. Incident to an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage they stipulated to spousal support in the amount of $1,000 per month. Approximately three months thereafter Richard sought a reduction solely on the basis of having lost his job. After a hearing, spousal support was reduced to $100 per month. This reduction was predicated entirely on Richard’s change of circumstances. In addition, the court established a sliding scale of future spousal support payments to Naomi commensurate with future increases in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. In Re Marriage of MulhernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. In Re Marriage of CobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. In Re Marriage of HolmgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. In Re Marriage of NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. In Re Marriage of WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of HurtienneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API