Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Leiss

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1966No. 51924Published

1DissentRawlings, J.

I respectfully dissent.

I. Having in his possession a preliminary information only, but with no arrest warrant having been issued, a Fort Dodge police officer at about 9:00 p.m., went to defendant’s home located outside the city limits, and there arrested him. Sections 755.1, 755.2 and 755.7, Code, 1962; Hobbs v. Illinois Central R. Co., 182 Iowa 316, 339-342, 165 N.W. 912; Norton v. Mathers, 222 Iowa 1170, 1178, 271 N.W. 321; United States v. Scott, 149 F. Supp. 837, 840; Price v. United States, D. C., 119 A.2d 718, 719; and Swetnam v. F. W. Woolworth Company, 83 Ariz. 189, 318 P.2d 364, 366.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API