Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Pittsburg, S. & N. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York

Decided February 6, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. On demurrers to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The defendants have interposed demurrers herein on the grounds that the court is without jurisdiction, the bill failing to show a controversy between citizens of different states at the time of the commencement of the action; that the Colonial Trust Company, the original trustee, or its successor, the Hamilton Trust Company, have not been requested to institute a foreclosure of the mortgage herein sought to be foreclosed, as provided therein; and generally, that the bill lacks equity and is multifarious.

The mortgage inter alia provides that bondholders shall not have the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Canada Southern Railway Co. v. GebhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Continental Insurance v. RhoadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Menard v. GogganSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Atlantic & Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Lowenthal v. Georgia Coast & P. R. Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1916
  3. Townsend v. Milaca Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. In re Central of Georgia Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1944
  5. Chapman v. Schiller, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API