Legal Opinion

City of St. Peters v. Kuester

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1966No. 32353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Commissioner.

Appellant brought an action for a declaratory judgment as provided by § 71.015, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. (commonly known as the “Sawyers Act”), authorizing it to hold an election on the issue as to whether its corporate boundaries should be extended. The trial court denied appellant the relief it sought and dismissed its action with prejudice. We will refer to the appellant as “the city” and to the respondents by their designation in the trial court or by their individual names.

It if our duty to review the case de novo reaching our own conclusions with respect to the law and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. City of Olivette v. GraelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. City of Aurora v. Empire District Electric CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. City of St. Ann v. BuschardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. City of Woodson Terrace v. HerklotzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Ash Grove v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. City of O'Fallon v. BethmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Western Cas. & Sur. Co. of Fort Scott v. WunderlichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. City of Odessa v. CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Ewing v. PughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API