Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Pugh

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1967No. 24738PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

This is a suit for property damage to plaintiff’s automobile. A jury was waived. The court found for and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $750. Defendant has appealed. This case being a trial to the court without a jury, the appellate court is required to review the case upon both the law and the evidence as in suits of an equitable nature. However, the judgment shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses. Rule 73.01(d), V.A.M.R.;…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. General Exchange Ins. Corp. v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Steele v. GoosenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Gilbert v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Hayes v. JenkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Masterson v. PlummerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holt v. MyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JesseeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Jacobs v. FoddeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. State ex rel. Woods v. KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Alsup v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API