Legal Opinion

Netzer v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1986No. Record 830185PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

This appeal involves the authority of a court to correct its own final decree, nunc pro tunc^ more than twenty-one days after its entry. More specifically, we must decide whether the court may so amend an erroneous recital in a final decree, in order to conform it to the true state of the record, where the erroneous recital appears to deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction.

The question arises in the context of a domestic relations dispute. Arlene Gilbert and Julian Reynolds were married in 1950. They established a marital home at 1116 Portner Road, in the City of Alexandria, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Raymond Thomas Council v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Jennings v. McDougleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Slaughter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  5. Chandler v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. School Board v. Caudill Rowlett Scott, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Jefferson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Dixon v. PughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  5. Rock v. RockCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API