Netzer v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
This appeal involves the authority of a court to correct its own final decree, nunc pro tunc^ more than twenty-one days after its entry. More specifically, we must decide whether the court may so amend an erroneous recital in a final decree, in order to conform it to the true state of the record, where the erroneous recital appears to deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction.
The question arises in the context of a domestic relations dispute. Arlene Gilbert and Julian Reynolds were married in 1950. They established a marital home at 1116 Portner Road, in the City of Alexandria, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Raymond Thomas Council v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Jennings v. McDougleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Slaughter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Chandler v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- School Board v. Caudill Rowlett Scott, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Jefferson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Dixon v. PughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Rock v. RockCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.