Bass v. Bass
Supreme Court of Georgia
1ConcurrenceJackson, C. J.
This court rules nothing save that the case is prematurely brought here. If the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court depends upon the judgment dismissing the whole case, it was apparently done by consent; and had the ruling been made as desired by the plaintiff in error, it would not have been a final disposition of the case. Because, however, of the confused agreement, the difficulty of arriving at its meaning, and the injustice which would be done to the plaintiff in error in not having the right to review a judgment, which her opponent had agreed she should have, the usual affirmance of the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Dickerson v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- G. M. J. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Henderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.