Legal Opinion

Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Hedlund

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 12, 2007No. 05-2127PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

In this appeal we must decide whether an employer may contest liability for an injury to its employee after admitting liability for the injury at a previous alternate medical care hearing. The workers’ compensation commissioner determined the employer was unable to deny liability based on the doctrine of issue preclusion. The district court affirmed. The court of appeals also affirmed, but held the liability issue was not res judicata. Instead, the court of appeals applied the doctrine of judicial estoppel and held the employer was estopped from contesting liability. On further…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Samuel Stallings v. Hussmann Corporation Brian GroningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. Grady Allen v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bell Bros. Heating & Air Conditioning v. GwinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Shari Kinseth and Ricky Kinseth, Coexecutors of the Estate of Larry Kinseth, and Shari Kinseth Individually v. Weil-McLain and State of Iowa ex rel. Civil Reparations Trust FundSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Hayes v. Rosenbaum Signs & Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In the Interest of Q.G. and W.G., Minor ChildrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  5. Zimmer v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API