Legal Opinion
Wood v. Jones
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1912No. 1613PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from Jackson County Court; TV. T. McConnell, Judge. Action by E. M. Wood against E. J. Jones and the Duke State Bank. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
The judgment of the court below in this case was entered May 4, 1909. Plaintiff was given 90 days in which to prepare and serve a case for this court; defendants to have ten days to suggest amendments, and same to be settled and signed on five days’ notice by either party, in writing, (Record, p. 93.) The case was served on the Duke State Bank October 2, 1909, as shown by the following acceptance:
“I, Everett Petry, attorney for the Duke State Bank, hereby accept service of the above and foregoing case-made, this the 2d day of October, 1909. Everett Petry, Attorney for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Inman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Thompson v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. MarksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Powell v. First State Bank of ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gordon Et Ux. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Walcher v. BurfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Oklahoma Auto Supply Co. v. MatheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.