Legal Opinion

Powell v. First State Bank of Clinton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 30, 1915No. 5656PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error jrom District Court, Custer County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the First State Bank of Clinton against L. L. Murray, wherein garnishment summons was issued against H. C. Powell and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and the garnishees bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

The First State Bank of Clinton, Okla., defendant in error, brought an action against one L.L. Murray, in the district court of Custer county, Okla., and had a garnishee summons issued against H.C. Powell and S.L. Shore, plaintiffs in error. Plaintiffs in error answered the garnishment proceedings by affidavit, saying that they had no property within their possession belonging to Murray, and that they were not in any manner indebted to him. Upon this, the defendant in error took issue, trial was had before the court, and judgment rendered against the plaintiffs in error as garnishees, on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  3. State National Bank v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Cowan v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. State Ex Rel. Freeling v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Town v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Liberty Life Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Hall v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API