Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Cannon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1972PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We agree with the Appellate Division, and for the reasons set forth in its opinion, that section 467-a of the Judiciary Law (L. 1963, ch. 204) is constitutional. However, since this is an action for a declaratory judgment, that court, instead of dismissing the complaint, should have made a declaration as to the constitutionality of the challenged section. (See, e.g., Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N Y 2d 317, 334; Fhagen v. Miller, 36 A D 2d 926, 927, affd. 29 N Y 2d 348.) The order appealed from should be modified, without costs, to the extent of directing judgment in favor of defendant, declaring that…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. American Home Assurance Co. v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. MTR. OF JOSLIN v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Goldberg v. CorcoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. McKechnie v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. National Organization for Women v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API