Legal Opinion

McKechnie v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1987PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County (William P. McCooe, J.), entered December 17, 1985, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint, is modified, on the law, to the extent of directing judgment in favor of respondents, declaring that Civil Service Law § 80 (8) is applicable only to retirement and pension benefits, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The question before us on this appeal is whether the New York State Legislature, in adopting Civil Service Law § 80 (7) in 1982, intended to give the members of New York City’s uniformed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Palmer v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Sweeney v. CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Byer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cemco Restaurants, Inc. v. Ten Park Avenue Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Herberg v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Coleman v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. McKechnie v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Cavallo v. Utica-Watertown Health Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API