Legal Opinion

United States v. Speed

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1978No. 12882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal by the United States from a trial court order granting a motion by Speed to suppress physical evidence. Upon determining that the seizure was not a violation of Speed’s Fourth Amendment protections, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

A vice detective received an evening telephone call from an informant, who stated that he had seen a man wearing a green print shirt and green jeans selling phenme-trazine 1 at a described location. The detective had no personal working experience with the informant, but was aware that the informant had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Nance v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. HayesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Carlisle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Allison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. In re B. K. C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API