United States v. Speed
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal by the United States from a trial court order granting a motion by Speed to suppress physical evidence. Upon determining that the seizure was not a violation of Speed’s Fourth Amendment protections, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
A vice detective received an evening telephone call from an informant, who stated that he had seen a man wearing a green print shirt and green jeans selling phenme-trazine 1 at a described location. The detective had no personal working experience with the informant, but was aware that the informant had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Nance v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- United States v. HayesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Carlisle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Allison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re B. K. C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.