Cracowaner v. Carlton National Bank
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtStrum, J.
This is an action in special assumpsit upon a promissory note under seal alleged to have been executed by the defendants below, Cracowaner and Weber, payable to E. M. Winemiller, or order, and by said payee endorsed and negotiated in due course to the plaintiff below, Carlton National Bank.
The declaration is in the usual form in assumpsit upon a promissory note. It is not susceptible of construction as a declaration either in debt or covenant. The note sued on is in the conventional form, but to the right of the signature of each of the makers appears the word “ (Seal).”
The first- question…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. Peninsular Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Rentz v. Live Oak BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Langley v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Paul v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Edgar v. BaconSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carpenter v. Florida Cent. Credit UnionSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Wester v. RigdonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Nelson v. ZiegfeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Williams v. Lawyer's Co-Operative Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Wright v. TatarianSupreme Court of Florida · 1930