Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Concord v. Duke Power Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1997No. 196PA96Published

1DissentJustice Whichard

The sole issue is whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the determination date, as defined by the statute, was 30 June 1986. The majority holds that this was error and that the correct determination date was 30 June 1992. I believe the plain language of the statute establishes that the correct determination date was 30 June 1986, and I therefore dissent.

The statute defines “determination date” as “[t]he effective date of annexation with respect to areas annexed to any city after April 20, 1965.” N.C.G.S. § 160A-331(l)(b) (1994). A statute must be applied as written. In re…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Domestic Electric Service, Inc. v. City of Rocky MountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API