Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Foor v. Rockwell International

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1997No. 95-271PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The only allowed condition in this claim is “right thoracic myositis.” Claimant asked the commission to formally recognize “bilateral radiculopathy” as an allowed condition. The commission refused.

Claimant did not prevail on appeal to the courts because they viewed the commission’s order as one involving extent of disability — a nonappealable order. R.C. 4123.512. They reached that conclusion by characterizing bilateral radiculopathy not as a “condition” — which would have made the commission’s order appealable on “right to participate” grounds — but as a “symptom.” This characterization,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lampkins v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Knapp v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Foor v. Rockwell Internatl.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. American National Can Co. v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-1209 (8-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API